Autoscrape API vs Sodeom Search API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs Sodeom Search API: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Sodeom Search API?
On our scheduled checks, Sodeom Search API leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus Sodeom Search API at 70.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or Sodeom Search API?
Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus Sodeom Search API at 4337 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and Sodeom Search API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and Sodeom Search API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and Sodeom Search API from the browser?
Only Sodeom Search API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Autoscrape API and Sodeom Search API free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Sodeom Search API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.