Autoscrape API vs ReportForge
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs ReportForge: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or ReportForge?
On our scheduled checks, ReportForge leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 99.02% versus ReportForge at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or ReportForge?
Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus ReportForge at 1362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and ReportForge need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and ReportForge is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and ReportForge from the browser?
Only Autoscrape API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. ReportForge needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Autoscrape API and ReportForge free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and ReportForge has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.