Autoscrape API vs Random Profiles
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs Random Profiles: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Random Profiles?
On our scheduled checks, Random Profiles leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus Random Profiles at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or Random Profiles?
Random Profiles has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus Random Profiles at 199 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and Random Profiles need an API key?
Autoscrape API needs no key, while Random Profiles requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Autoscrape API first.
Can I call Autoscrape API and Random Profiles from the browser?
Only Random Profiles is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Autoscrape API and Random Profiles free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Random Profiles has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.