Autoscrape API vs QR & Barcode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d44.4%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms696511
P95 · ms14441231
Authnonenone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Autoscrape API vs QR & Barcode: common questions

Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or QR & Barcode?

On our scheduled checks, QR & Barcode leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus QR & Barcode at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Autoscrape API or QR & Barcode?

QR & Barcode has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus QR & Barcode at 511 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Autoscrape API and QR & Barcode need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and QR & Barcode is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Autoscrape API and QR & Barcode from the browser?

Only QR & Barcode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Autoscrape API and QR & Barcode free for commercial use?

Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and QR & Barcode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.