Autoscrape API vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs Passantenfrequenzen Zürich: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Passantenfrequenzen Zürich?
On our scheduled checks, Passantenfrequenzen Zürich leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 99.02% versus Passantenfrequenzen Zürich at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or Passantenfrequenzen Zürich?
Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus Passantenfrequenzen Zürich at 569 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich from the browser?
Yes — both Autoscrape API and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Autoscrape API and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Passantenfrequenzen Zürich has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.