shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Autoscrape API vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoscrape APINEW—HunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Autoscrape API vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at —% versus Hunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Autoscrape API and Hunter need an API key?

Autoscrape API needs no key, while Hunter requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Autoscrape API first.

Can I call Autoscrape API and Hunter from the browser?

Only Autoscrape API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Autoscrape API and Hunter free for commercial use?

Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.