Autoscrape API vs GitHub REST API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs GitHub REST API: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or GitHub REST API?
On our scheduled checks, GitHub REST API leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus GitHub REST API at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or GitHub REST API?
GitHub REST API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus GitHub REST API at 349 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and GitHub REST API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and GitHub REST API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and GitHub REST API from the browser?
Only GitHub REST API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Autoscrape API and GitHub REST API free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and GitHub REST API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.