shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Autoscrape API vs GitHub Project Issues

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoscrape APINEW—GitHub Project IssuesNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Autoscrape API vs GitHub Project Issues: common questions

Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or GitHub Project Issues?

On our scheduled checks, GitHub Project Issues leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at —% versus GitHub Project Issues at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and GitHub Project Issues is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues from the browser?

Only Autoscrape API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Project Issues needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues free for commercial use?

Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and GitHub Project Issues has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.