Autoscrape API vs GitHub Project Issues

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms717478
P95 · ms14444310
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Autoscrape API vs GitHub Project Issues: common questions

Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or GitHub Project Issues?

Both are neck-and-neck — Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues each measure 99.02% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Autoscrape API or GitHub Project Issues?

GitHub Project Issues has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus GitHub Project Issues at 478 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and GitHub Project Issues is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues from the browser?

Only Autoscrape API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Project Issues needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Autoscrape API and GitHub Project Issues free for commercial use?

Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and GitHub Project Issues has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.