shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Autoscrape API vs FakerAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoscrape APIHEALTHY87FakerAPIDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d99.02%1.0%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms717860
P95 · ms1444860
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — no key
Rate limitUnpublished60 req/window · 59 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Autoscrape API vs FakerAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or FakerAPI?

On our scheduled checks, Autoscrape API leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 99.02% versus FakerAPI at 1.0% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Autoscrape API or FakerAPI?

Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus FakerAPI at 860 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Autoscrape API and FakerAPI need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and FakerAPI is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Autoscrape API and FakerAPI from the browser?

Only Autoscrape API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. FakerAPI needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Autoscrape API and FakerAPI free for commercial use?

Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and FakerAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.