Autoscrape API vs Fake JSON API
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs Fake JSON API: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Fake JSON API?
On our scheduled checks, Fake JSON API leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus Fake JSON API at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or Fake JSON API?
Fake JSON API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus Fake JSON API at 342 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and Fake JSON API need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and Fake JSON API is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and Fake JSON API from the browser?
Only Fake JSON API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are Autoscrape API and Fake JSON API free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Fake JSON API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.