Autoscrape API vs eNanoMapper database
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs eNanoMapper database: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or eNanoMapper database?
On our scheduled checks, eNanoMapper database leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 44.4% versus eNanoMapper database at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or eNanoMapper database?
Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 696 ms versus eNanoMapper database at 788 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and eNanoMapper database need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and eNanoMapper database is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and eNanoMapper database from the browser?
Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Autoscrape API and eNanoMapper database from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.
Are Autoscrape API and eNanoMapper database free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and eNanoMapper database has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.