Autoscrape API vs CDNJS
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs CDNJS: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or CDNJS?
On our scheduled checks, CDNJS leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 99.02% versus CDNJS at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or CDNJS?
CDNJS has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus CDNJS at 281 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and CDNJS need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and CDNJS is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and CDNJS from the browser?
Yes — both Autoscrape API and CDNJS send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Autoscrape API and CDNJS free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and CDNJS has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.