Autoscrape API vs Beeceptor
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
Autoscrape API vs Beeceptor: common questions
Which is more reliable, Autoscrape API or Beeceptor?
On our scheduled checks, Beeceptor leads on measured uptime — Autoscrape API at 99.02% versus Beeceptor at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, Autoscrape API or Beeceptor?
Autoscrape API has the lower median latency in our checks — Autoscrape API responds in 717 ms versus Beeceptor at 750 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do Autoscrape API and Beeceptor need an API key?
Neither needs a paid key — Autoscrape API is callable with no signup, and Beeceptor is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.
Can I call Autoscrape API and Beeceptor from the browser?
Yes — both Autoscrape API and Beeceptor send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are Autoscrape API and Beeceptor free for commercial use?
Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms, and Beeceptor has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.