shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

AutoChangelog vs SiteIntel

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoChangelogNEW—SiteIntelNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs SiteIntel: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or SiteIntel?

On our scheduled checks, SiteIntel leads on measured uptime — AutoChangelog at —% versus SiteIntel at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do AutoChangelog and SiteIntel need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — AutoChangelog uses an API key and SiteIntel uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call AutoChangelog and SiteIntel from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call AutoChangelog and SiteIntel from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are AutoChangelog and SiteIntel free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.