AutoChangelog vs Kroki
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
AutoChangelog vs Kroki: common questions
Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Kroki?
Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and Kroki each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, AutoChangelog or Kroki?
AutoChangelog has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus Kroki at 633 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do AutoChangelog and Kroki need an API key?
Kroki needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Kroki first.
Can I call AutoChangelog and Kroki from the browser?
Only Kroki is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are AutoChangelog and Kroki free for commercial use?
AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Kroki has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.