AutoChangelog vs Icanhazip
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
AutoChangelog vs Icanhazip: common questions
Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Icanhazip?
On our scheduled checks, AutoChangelog leads on measured uptime — AutoChangelog at 100% versus Icanhazip at 26.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, AutoChangelog or Icanhazip?
Icanhazip has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus Icanhazip at 328 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do AutoChangelog and Icanhazip need an API key?
Icanhazip needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Icanhazip first.
Can I call AutoChangelog and Icanhazip from the browser?
Only Icanhazip is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are AutoChangelog and Icanhazip free for commercial use?
AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Icanhazip has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.