AutoChangelog vs Hipsum

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms578723
P95 · ms17291732
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs Hipsum: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Hipsum?

Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and Hipsum each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, AutoChangelog or Hipsum?

AutoChangelog has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus Hipsum at 723 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AutoChangelog and Hipsum need an API key?

Hipsum needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Hipsum first.

Can I call AutoChangelog and Hipsum from the browser?

Only Hipsum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AutoChangelog and Hipsum free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Hipsum has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.