AutoChangelog vs Global Shark Attack API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms578719
P95 · ms17291794
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs Global Shark Attack API: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Global Shark Attack API?

Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and Global Shark Attack API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, AutoChangelog or Global Shark Attack API?

AutoChangelog has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus Global Shark Attack API at 719 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AutoChangelog and Global Shark Attack API need an API key?

Global Shark Attack API needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Global Shark Attack API first.

Can I call AutoChangelog and Global Shark Attack API from the browser?

Only Global Shark Attack API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AutoChangelog and Global Shark Attack API free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Global Shark Attack API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.