AutoChangelog vs GitHub REST API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms578568
P95 · ms17292671
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs GitHub REST API: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or GitHub REST API?

Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and GitHub REST API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, AutoChangelog or GitHub REST API?

GitHub REST API has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus GitHub REST API at 568 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AutoChangelog and GitHub REST API need an API key?

GitHub REST API needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GitHub REST API first.

Can I call AutoChangelog and GitHub REST API from the browser?

Only GitHub REST API is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AutoChangelog and GitHub REST API free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and GitHub REST API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.