shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

AutoChangelog vs Gcore CDN

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoChangelogHEALTHY92Gcore CDNHEALTHY96
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms578362
P95 · ms17291221
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key may be required for production
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs Gcore CDN: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Gcore CDN?

Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and Gcore CDN each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, AutoChangelog or Gcore CDN?

Gcore CDN has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus Gcore CDN at 362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AutoChangelog and Gcore CDN need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — AutoChangelog uses an API key and Gcore CDN uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call AutoChangelog and Gcore CDN from the browser?

Only Gcore CDN is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AutoChangelog and Gcore CDN free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Gcore CDN has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.