AutoChangelog vs FakeStoreAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms578369
P95 · ms17292305
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs FakeStoreAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or FakeStoreAPI?

Both are neck-and-neck — AutoChangelog and FakeStoreAPI each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, AutoChangelog or FakeStoreAPI?

FakeStoreAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus FakeStoreAPI at 369 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do AutoChangelog and FakeStoreAPI need an API key?

FakeStoreAPI needs no key, while AutoChangelog requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakeStoreAPI first.

Can I call AutoChangelog and FakeStoreAPI from the browser?

Only FakeStoreAPI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are AutoChangelog and FakeStoreAPI free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and FakeStoreAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.