AutoChangelog vs ELI
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
AutoChangelog vs ELI: common questions
Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or ELI?
On our scheduled checks, AutoChangelog leads on measured uptime — AutoChangelog at 100% versus ELI at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.
Which is faster, AutoChangelog or ELI?
AutoChangelog has the lower median latency in our checks — AutoChangelog responds in 578 ms versus ELI at 591 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do AutoChangelog and ELI need an API key?
Both ask you to authenticate — AutoChangelog uses an API key and ELI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.
Can I call AutoChangelog and ELI from the browser?
Only ELI is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are AutoChangelog and ELI free for commercial use?
AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and ELI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.