shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

AutoChangelog vs Cutt.ly

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAutoChangelogNEW—Cutt.lyNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

AutoChangelog vs Cutt.ly: common questions

Which is more reliable, AutoChangelog or Cutt.ly?

On our scheduled checks, Cutt.ly leads on measured uptime — AutoChangelog at —% versus Cutt.ly at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do AutoChangelog and Cutt.ly need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — AutoChangelog uses an API key and Cutt.ly uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call AutoChangelog and Cutt.ly from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call AutoChangelog and Cutt.ly from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are AutoChangelog and Cutt.ly free for commercial use?

AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms, and Cutt.ly has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.