shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Audexum vs Autoscrape API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAudexumHEALTHY95Autoscrape APIDEAD0
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.3%44.4%
Uptime · 30d100%0.0%
P50 · ms307696
P95 · ms26291444
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Audexum vs Autoscrape API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Audexum or Autoscrape API?

On our scheduled checks, Audexum leads on measured uptime — Audexum at 98.3% versus Autoscrape API at 44.4% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Audexum or Autoscrape API?

Audexum has the lower median latency in our checks — Audexum responds in 307 ms versus Autoscrape API at 696 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Audexum and Autoscrape API need an API key?

Autoscrape API needs no key, while Audexum requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Autoscrape API first.

Can I call Audexum and Autoscrape API from the browser?

Only Audexum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Autoscrape API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Audexum and Autoscrape API free for commercial use?

Audexum has unclear commercial terms, and Autoscrape API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.