Audexum vs AutoChangelog

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d97.1%100%
Uptime · 30d95.0%100%
P50 · ms417578
P95 · ms11031729
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Audexum vs AutoChangelog: common questions

Which is more reliable, Audexum or AutoChangelog?

On our scheduled checks, AutoChangelog leads on measured uptime — Audexum at 97.1% versus AutoChangelog at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Audexum or AutoChangelog?

Audexum has the lower median latency in our checks — Audexum responds in 417 ms versus AutoChangelog at 578 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Audexum and AutoChangelog need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — Audexum uses an API key and AutoChangelog uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call Audexum and AutoChangelog from the browser?

Only Audexum is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. AutoChangelog needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Audexum and AutoChangelog free for commercial use?

Audexum has unclear commercial terms, and AutoChangelog has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.