Astroworld vs Traveller Map

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.02%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms5281184
P95 · ms17814428
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Traveller Map: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Traveller Map?

On our scheduled checks, Astroworld leads on measured uptime — Astroworld at 100% versus Traveller Map at 99.02% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Astroworld or Traveller Map?

Astroworld has the lower median latency in our checks — Astroworld responds in 528 ms versus Traveller Map at 1184 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Astroworld and Traveller Map need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Astroworld is callable with no signup, and Traveller Map is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Astroworld and Traveller Map from the browser?

Yes — both Astroworld and Traveller Map send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Astroworld and Traveller Map free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Traveller Map has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.