Astroworld vs Steam

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%88.2%
Uptime · 30d100%85.0%
P50 · ms528268
P95 · ms1781486
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished (undocumented endpoint; IP rate-limited)
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Steam: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Steam?

On our scheduled checks, Astroworld leads on measured uptime — Astroworld at 100% versus Steam at 88.2% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Astroworld or Steam?

Steam has the lower median latency in our checks — Astroworld responds in 528 ms versus Steam at 268 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Astroworld and Steam need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Astroworld is callable with no signup, and Steam is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Astroworld and Steam from the browser?

Only Astroworld is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Steam needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Astroworld and Steam free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Steam has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.