Astroworld vs Raider

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms327140
P95 · ms17814160
Authnonenone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified (Blizzard game data)
Free tierFree — no keyFree, no API key for public data
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60300 req/window · 0 remaining · resets 1787935537
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Raider: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Raider?

On our scheduled checks, Astroworld leads on measured uptime — Astroworld at 100% versus Raider at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Astroworld or Raider?

Raider has the lower median latency in our checks — Astroworld responds in 327 ms versus Raider at 140 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Astroworld and Raider need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Astroworld is callable with no signup, and Raider is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Astroworld and Raider from the browser?

Yes — both Astroworld and Raider send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are Astroworld and Raider free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Raider has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.