Astroworld vs Minecraft ServerHub

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%86.1%
Uptime · 30d100%58.3%
P50 · ms3271003
P95 · ms17812440
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree — limits not published
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Minecraft ServerHub: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Minecraft ServerHub?

On our scheduled checks, Astroworld leads on measured uptime — Astroworld at 100% versus Minecraft ServerHub at 86.1% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, Astroworld or Minecraft ServerHub?

Astroworld has the lower median latency in our checks — Astroworld responds in 327 ms versus Minecraft ServerHub at 1003 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Astroworld and Minecraft ServerHub need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — Astroworld is callable with no signup, and Minecraft ServerHub is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call Astroworld and Minecraft ServerHub from the browser?

Only Astroworld is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Minecraft ServerHub needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Astroworld and Minecraft ServerHub free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Minecraft ServerHub has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.