shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Astroworld vs Battle.net

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAstroworldHEALTHY94Battle.netHEALTHY85
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms5281024
P95 · ms17813173
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Battle.net: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Battle.net?

Both are neck-and-neck — Astroworld and Battle.net each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Astroworld or Battle.net?

Astroworld has the lower median latency in our checks — Astroworld responds in 528 ms versus Battle.net at 1024 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Astroworld and Battle.net need an API key?

Astroworld needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Astroworld first.

Can I call Astroworld and Battle.net from the browser?

Only Astroworld is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Astroworld and Battle.net free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Battle.net has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.