shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Astroworld vs Battle.net

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAstroworldNEW—Battle.netNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified (Minecraft game data; Mojang content)Unverified
Free tierFree — no keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limit100 req/window · 99 remaining · resets 60Unpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Astroworld vs Battle.net: common questions

Which is more reliable, Astroworld or Battle.net?

On our scheduled checks, Battle.net leads on measured uptime — Astroworld at —% versus Battle.net at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Astroworld and Battle.net need an API key?

Astroworld needs no key, while Battle.net requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Astroworld first.

Can I call Astroworld and Battle.net from the browser?

Only Astroworld is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Battle.net needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Astroworld and Battle.net free for commercial use?

Astroworld has unclear commercial terms, and Battle.net has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.