shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

Art Institute of Chicago vs Wallhaven

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIArt Institute of ChicagoNEW—WallhavenNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthnoneapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useyesunclear
Data licenseCC0 1.0 for metadata; 'description' field is CC-BY 4.0Unverified
Free tierFree, no keyFree tier — key may be required
Rate limit60 requests/min per IP (per docs)45 req/window · 44 remaining
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Art Institute of Chicago vs Wallhaven: common questions

Which is more reliable, Art Institute of Chicago or Wallhaven?

On our scheduled checks, Wallhaven leads on measured uptime — Art Institute of Chicago at —% versus Wallhaven at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do Art Institute of Chicago and Wallhaven need an API key?

Art Institute of Chicago needs no key, while Wallhaven requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Art Institute of Chicago first.

Can I call Art Institute of Chicago and Wallhaven from the browser?

Only Art Institute of Chicago is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Wallhaven needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are Art Institute of Chicago and Wallhaven free for commercial use?

Art Institute of Chicago allows commercial use on its free tier, and Wallhaven has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.