arcsecond.io vs Bootprint

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d57.9%100%
Uptime · 30d0.0%100%
P50 · ms50370
P95 · ms1489699
Authnonenone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not publishedFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished60 req/window · 58 remaining · resets 1792038689
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

arcsecond.io vs Bootprint: common questions

Which is more reliable, arcsecond.io or Bootprint?

On our scheduled checks, Bootprint leads on measured uptime — arcsecond.io at 57.9% versus Bootprint at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, arcsecond.io or Bootprint?

Bootprint has the lower median latency in our checks — arcsecond.io responds in 503 ms versus Bootprint at 70 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do arcsecond.io and Bootprint need an API key?

Neither needs a paid key — arcsecond.io is callable with no signup, and Bootprint is callable with no signup. Both are quick to prototype with; rate limits still apply.

Can I call arcsecond.io and Bootprint from the browser?

Only arcsecond.io is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Bootprint needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are arcsecond.io and Bootprint free for commercial use?

arcsecond.io has unclear commercial terms, and Bootprint has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.