shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

apilayer pdflayer vs Hunter

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIapilayer pdflayerNEW—HunterNEW—
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d—%—%
Uptime · 30d—%—%
P50 · ms——
P95 · ms——
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be requiredFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

apilayer pdflayer vs Hunter: common questions

Which is more reliable, apilayer pdflayer or Hunter?

On our scheduled checks, Hunter leads on measured uptime — apilayer pdflayer at —% versus Hunter at —% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Do apilayer pdflayer and Hunter need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — apilayer pdflayer uses an API key and Hunter uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call apilayer pdflayer and Hunter from the browser?

Only apilayer pdflayer is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. Hunter needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are apilayer pdflayer and Hunter free for commercial use?

apilayer pdflayer has unclear commercial terms, and Hunter has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.