apilayer aviationstack vs StayingAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms287143
P95 · ms1147913
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-09-21
operationalpartialdownno data

apilayer aviationstack vs StayingAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, apilayer aviationstack or StayingAPI?

On our scheduled checks, StayingAPI leads on measured uptime — apilayer aviationstack at 98.9% versus StayingAPI at 100% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, apilayer aviationstack or StayingAPI?

StayingAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — apilayer aviationstack responds in 287 ms versus StayingAPI at 143 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do apilayer aviationstack and StayingAPI need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — apilayer aviationstack uses an API key and StayingAPI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call apilayer aviationstack and StayingAPI from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call apilayer aviationstack and StayingAPI from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are apilayer aviationstack and StayingAPI free for commercial use?

apilayer aviationstack has unclear commercial terms, and StayingAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.