apilayer aviationstack vs PostalPinCode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.0%98.0%
Uptime · 30d96.7%98.3%
P50 · ms535912
P95 · ms11473724
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

apilayer aviationstack vs PostalPinCode: common questions

Which is more reliable, apilayer aviationstack or PostalPinCode?

Both are neck-and-neck — apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode each measure 98.0% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, apilayer aviationstack or PostalPinCode?

apilayer aviationstack has the lower median latency in our checks — apilayer aviationstack responds in 535 ms versus PostalPinCode at 912 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode need an API key?

PostalPinCode needs no key, while apilayer aviationstack requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for PostalPinCode first.

Can I call apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode from the browser?

Only PostalPinCode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. apilayer aviationstack needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode free for commercial use?

apilayer aviationstack has unclear commercial terms, and PostalPinCode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.