apilayer aviationstack vs PostalPinCode

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d98.9%98.3%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms287699
P95 · ms11473724
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnoyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

apilayer aviationstack vs PostalPinCode: common questions

Which is more reliable, apilayer aviationstack or PostalPinCode?

On our scheduled checks, apilayer aviationstack leads on measured uptime — apilayer aviationstack at 98.9% versus PostalPinCode at 98.3% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, apilayer aviationstack or PostalPinCode?

apilayer aviationstack has the lower median latency in our checks — apilayer aviationstack responds in 287 ms versus PostalPinCode at 699 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode need an API key?

PostalPinCode needs no key, while apilayer aviationstack requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for PostalPinCode first.

Can I call apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode from the browser?

Only PostalPinCode is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. apilayer aviationstack needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are apilayer aviationstack and PostalPinCode free for commercial use?

apilayer aviationstack has unclear commercial terms, and PostalPinCode has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.