Apify vs RuntimeBuzz Article API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms381539
P95 · ms7651222
AuthapiKeynone
CORSnono
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverifiedUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key requiredFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublishedUnpublished
In directory since2026-07-052026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

Apify vs RuntimeBuzz Article API: common questions

Which is more reliable, Apify or RuntimeBuzz Article API?

Both are neck-and-neck — Apify and RuntimeBuzz Article API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, Apify or RuntimeBuzz Article API?

Apify has the lower median latency in our checks — Apify responds in 381 ms versus RuntimeBuzz Article API at 539 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do Apify and RuntimeBuzz Article API need an API key?

RuntimeBuzz Article API needs no key, while Apify requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for RuntimeBuzz Article API first.

Can I call Apify and RuntimeBuzz Article API from the browser?

Neither sends browser-friendly CORS headers reliably, so call Apify and RuntimeBuzz Article API from a server or proxy rather than client-side. The CORS and HTTPS rows above show exactly what we detected for each.

Are Apify and RuntimeBuzz Article API free for commercial use?

Apify has unclear commercial terms, and RuntimeBuzz Article API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.