APIClaw vs Yes-as-a-Service

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661362
P95 · ms7001363
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs Yes-as-a-Service: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or Yes-as-a-Service?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus Yes-as-a-Service at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or Yes-as-a-Service?

Yes-as-a-Service has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus Yes-as-a-Service at 362 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and Yes-as-a-Service need an API key?

Yes-as-a-Service needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Yes-as-a-Service first.

Can I call APIClaw and Yes-as-a-Service from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and Yes-as-a-Service send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and Yes-as-a-Service free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and Yes-as-a-Service has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.