APIClaw vs VATlayer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms661327
P95 · ms7002118
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — key may be required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs VATlayer: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or VATlayer?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus VATlayer at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or VATlayer?

VATlayer has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus VATlayer at 327 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and VATlayer need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and VATlayer uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call APIClaw and VATlayer from the browser?

Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. VATlayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are APIClaw and VATlayer free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and VATlayer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.