APIClaw vs SiteIntel
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
APIClaw vs SiteIntel: common questions
Which is more reliable, APIClaw or SiteIntel?
Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and SiteIntel each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, APIClaw or SiteIntel?
SiteIntel has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus SiteIntel at 585 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do APIClaw and SiteIntel need an API key?
Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and SiteIntel uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.
Can I call APIClaw and SiteIntel from the browser?
Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. SiteIntel needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.
Are APIClaw and SiteIntel free for commercial use?
APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and SiteIntel has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.