APIClaw vs RubyGems

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661211
P95 · ms7001609
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs RubyGems: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or RubyGems?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus RubyGems at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or RubyGems?

RubyGems has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus RubyGems at 211 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and RubyGems need an API key?

RubyGems needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for RubyGems first.

Can I call APIClaw and RubyGems from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and RubyGems send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and RubyGems free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and RubyGems has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.