APIClaw vs RSQ API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661473
P95 · ms7004248
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesno
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs RSQ API: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or RSQ API?

Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and RSQ API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, APIClaw or RSQ API?

RSQ API has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus RSQ API at 473 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and RSQ API need an API key?

RSQ API needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for RSQ API first.

Can I call APIClaw and RSQ API from the browser?

Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. RSQ API needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are APIClaw and RSQ API free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and RSQ API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.