APIClaw vs ParlayAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%93.5%
Uptime · 30d100%93.3%
P50 · ms661354
P95 · ms7003104
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data license
Free tier
Rate limit
In directory since2026-10-302026-10-04
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs ParlayAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or ParlayAPI?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus ParlayAPI at 93.5% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or ParlayAPI?

ParlayAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus ParlayAPI at 354 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and ParlayAPI need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and ParlayAPI uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call APIClaw and ParlayAPI from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and ParlayAPI send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and ParlayAPI free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and ParlayAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.