APIClaw vs Parkhaus Basel API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%98.9%
Uptime · 30d100%98.3%
P50 · ms661800
P95 · ms7004885
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs Parkhaus Basel API: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or Parkhaus Basel API?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus Parkhaus Basel API at 98.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or Parkhaus Basel API?

APIClaw has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus Parkhaus Basel API at 800 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and Parkhaus Basel API need an API key?

Parkhaus Basel API needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for Parkhaus Basel API first.

Can I call APIClaw and Parkhaus Basel API from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and Parkhaus Basel API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and Parkhaus Basel API free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and Parkhaus Basel API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.