shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

APIClaw vs OnSched Consumer API

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAPIClawREACHABLE100OnSched Consumer APIHEALTHY90
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661529
P95 · ms7003418
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs OnSched Consumer API: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or OnSched Consumer API?

Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and OnSched Consumer API each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, APIClaw or OnSched Consumer API?

OnSched Consumer API has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus OnSched Consumer API at 529 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and OnSched Consumer API need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and OnSched Consumer API uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call APIClaw and OnSched Consumer API from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and OnSched Consumer API send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and OnSched Consumer API free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and OnSched Consumer API has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.