APIClaw vs languagelayer

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661326
P95 · ms700893
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs languagelayer: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or languagelayer?

Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and languagelayer each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, APIClaw or languagelayer?

languagelayer has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus languagelayer at 326 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and languagelayer need an API key?

languagelayer needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for languagelayer first.

Can I call APIClaw and languagelayer from the browser?

Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. languagelayer needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are APIClaw and languagelayer free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and languagelayer has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.