APIClaw vs IFTTT

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%100%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661369
P95 · ms7001673
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs IFTTT: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or IFTTT?

Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and IFTTT each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.

Which is faster, APIClaw or IFTTT?

IFTTT has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus IFTTT at 369 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and IFTTT need an API key?

IFTTT needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for IFTTT first.

Can I call APIClaw and IFTTT from the browser?

Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. IFTTT needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are APIClaw and IFTTT free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and IFTTT has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.