shipapis
StarSubmit an APISubmit API

APIClaw vs GitHub Project Issues

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

APIAPIClawREACHABLE100GitHub Project IssuesHEALTHY95
Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%99.44%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms661318
P95 · ms7001539
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesno
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — limits not published
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs GitHub Project Issues: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or GitHub Project Issues?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus GitHub Project Issues at 99.44% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or GitHub Project Issues?

GitHub Project Issues has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus GitHub Project Issues at 318 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and GitHub Project Issues need an API key?

GitHub Project Issues needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for GitHub Project Issues first.

Can I call APIClaw and GitHub Project Issues from the browser?

Only APIClaw is browser-friendly — it returns CORS headers over HTTPS. GitHub Project Issues needs a server-side call or proxy, so factor that into which one fits a front-end project.

Are APIClaw and GitHub Project Issues free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and GitHub Project Issues has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.