APIClaw vs GeoScore

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%97.8%
Uptime · 30d100%100%
P50 · ms6614119
P95 · ms7004952
AuthapiKeyapiKey
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree tier — API key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs GeoScore: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or GeoScore?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus GeoScore at 97.8% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or GeoScore?

APIClaw has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus GeoScore at 4119 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and GeoScore need an API key?

Both ask you to authenticate — APIClaw uses an API key and GeoScore uses an API key. Each key is free to obtain; the Auth and Card-required rows above spell out the signup terms.

Can I call APIClaw and GeoScore from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and GeoScore send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and GeoScore free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and GeoScore has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.