APIClaw vs FakeStoreAPI

Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.

Uptime · 30d
Uptime · 90d100%93.9%
Uptime · 30d100%91.7%
P50 · ms661373
P95 · ms7004718
AuthapiKeynone
CORSyesyes
HTTPSyesyes
Card requirednono
Commercial useunclearunclear
Data licenseUnverified
Free tierFree — no key required
Rate limitUnpublished
In directory since2026-10-302026-07-05
operationalpartialdownno data

APIClaw vs FakeStoreAPI: common questions

Which is more reliable, APIClaw or FakeStoreAPI?

On our scheduled checks, APIClaw leads on measured uptime — APIClaw at 100% versus FakeStoreAPI at 93.9% over 90 days. These are our own probe results, not provider claims; the uptime bars above show the day-by-day record for both.

Which is faster, APIClaw or FakeStoreAPI?

FakeStoreAPI has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus FakeStoreAPI at 373 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.

Do APIClaw and FakeStoreAPI need an API key?

FakeStoreAPI needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for FakeStoreAPI first.

Can I call APIClaw and FakeStoreAPI from the browser?

Yes — both APIClaw and FakeStoreAPI send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.

Are APIClaw and FakeStoreAPI free for commercial use?

APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and FakeStoreAPI has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.