APIClaw vs CDNJS
Same instrument, two spec sheets — measured, not claimed.
APIClaw vs CDNJS: common questions
Which is more reliable, APIClaw or CDNJS?
Both are neck-and-neck — APIClaw and CDNJS each measure 100% uptime over 90 days on our probe schedule. Reliability here is verified from our own scheduled checks; use the 30-day bars above to see which has been steadier lately.
Which is faster, APIClaw or CDNJS?
CDNJS has the lower median latency in our checks — APIClaw responds in 661 ms versus CDNJS at 166 ms (P50). Tail latency (P95) is in the table above; for most workloads the median is the number that shapes how the API feels.
Do APIClaw and CDNJS need an API key?
CDNJS needs no key, while APIClaw requires a free API key. If you want to start calling without signup, reach for CDNJS first.
Can I call APIClaw and CDNJS from the browser?
Yes — both APIClaw and CDNJS send CORS headers over HTTPS, so front-end code can fetch either directly with no backend proxy. That makes them easy to swap in a client-side app while you compare responses.
Are APIClaw and CDNJS free for commercial use?
APIClaw has unclear commercial terms, and CDNJS has unclear commercial terms. We track service terms and the data license as separate fields — see the Commercial use and Data license rows above, and confirm both before shipping either in a paid product.